Fact Vs. Fiction

So I’ve been saying for a long time that if the media treated Romney and Obama the same way, that Obama would get around 25% of the vote. I stand by that statement, and there are things about Obama that nobody in the mainstream media will tell you, because they only want you to know about the “good” things Obama has done. My question is, what has he done that’s so good? Behind most of the examples, are things that HE didn’t really do, or that actually had a lot of negative originations and/or consequences. Obama is a flat out liar, and throughout this post, that will be proven. The media will defend him until the bitter end, and they have been doing that all along. If they hadn’t been doing that since before the last election, he never would have been voted in! Keep in mind, that to me, Romney was the worst Republican candidate. Personally, I wanted Herman Cain to win the nomination, and my second would have been Newt. However, on Romney’s worst day, he’s still better than Obama on his best day.


We’ll start off on the most recent events in Benghazi. Now, I’m one of the many who bought into this LIE that our ambassador was killed because of outrage and anger resulting from the YouTube video. This lie was repeated several times for weeks, and after the attacks, Obama mentioned the word terror, vaguely, possibly referring to the original attacks in 01. We find out a couple of weeks later that the MURDER had nothing to do with the video, and that it was a blatant lie, and that the Obama Administration knew that it had nothing to do with it. They wanted to make it look like this was a spontaneous attack, because extra security had been requested, but denied. So it was a planned attack, and Obama wanted us to think that it just came from nowhere, because ultimately, the death is on his hands. Now, the person that made that video has been blasted, and basically accused of murder. Where is the outrage on his behalf? I don’t agree with what he said or did, but we live in America, and not only did he get accused of contributing to someone’s death, it was the President of the United States of America pointing the finger, to keep the finger being pointed at himself! Why don’t we care about this? Bill Clinton was impeached for lying about sex. President Bush was called a liar and many wanted him impeached when we didn’t find WMDs. But nobody cares when Obama blatantly lies to the entire world?!? Now the difference here is that contrary to popular belief, despite what the media tells us, George Bush didn’t go to war in Iraq based on a personal vendetta. Look on YouTube and you will find plenty of democrats, Bill, Hillary, John Kerry, and many others, agreeing that Saddam Hussein had weapons, and that he needed to be stopped, and they voted for the war. On a side note, Joe Biden claimed during his debate with Paul Ryan that he voted against both wars, but his actual voting record shows that he voted for them both. In a report by John Rockefeller, it was proven that every single statement that George Bush made about Saddam having weapons was supported by intelligence all over the world. Amazingly still, that doesn’t make the news. Everybody still blames him for going to war based on a lie, when that wasn’t the case at all. But Obama has been a PROVEN liar, and I haven’t even heard the word impeachment for some reason. If that’s not grounds for it, I don’t know what is. Oh, and one other thing, the war in Libya, really was an illegal war. Obama refused to get congressional approval. That’s just one thing more thing that we didn’t hear about from the mainstream media.

As it relates to class warfare, I’m so sick and tired of this “Romney is rich and I can’t relate to him” garbage. Wouldn’t we all like to have what Romney has? People like to talk a lot about the rich but really don’t have a clue when it comes to facts, and they certainly don’t understand how the economy works. I can’t defend his tax record, because I haven’t seen the returns, and honestly, I’m not a CPA so I can’t say how much he paid, but I do know something that the media doesn’t want YOU to. Ever heard of Timothy Geithner? He’s the treasury secretary, and he’s a proven and admitted tax cheat. Why don’t we hear about this one? Are you noticing a trend? The main point of this section is actually that the idea that the democrats are all for helping the poor and that the republicans are all for the rich is a proven lie. Study after Study shows that democrats make more money, and give far less of it away. There have been many of these, but the most recent that I saw showed that democrats made 6% more in income, yet gave 30% less! You won’t see that on CNN or MSNBC. So my question for all of these rich liberals who always say “we don’t pay enough”, is why don’t you give the difference between what you think you SHOULD be taxed and what you ARE being taxed to the middle class or poor? My suggestion: put your money where your mouth is! Romney has given far more to charity than Obama, and I’m not talking about dollars, I’m talking about percentages. Don’t be fooled, Obama isn’t exactly poor. And tell me, how can you relate to Obama? We’ll get to his past soon enough, but he’s likely the shadiest person to ever grace the Oval Office, and we don’t hear any of it. To those who say they can’t relate to Romney because he’s rich, isn’t that exactly what you want? If 10 people were to rub a lamp one a genie came out, AT LEAST 9 of those people would wish for money in one of their three wishes! Romney is the American dream, but since it’s only our dream, and not our reality, we want the government to take it from him and give it to us. Do you know what Bain Capital did? We hear about all the jobs that he supposedly lost, but we don’t hear of those that he saved. Bain Capital’s job was to buy companies going out of business, and turn the companies around. His success rate was 70%. So you do the math, if 70% of the companies were kept open, doesn’t that mean he did far more harm than good? Adding to that, don’t we want someone who knows a thing or two about making money to be the in the office? Obama was a senator for 2 years and a Community Organizer before that. He did nothing before becoming president, and somehow we bought in to this “hope and change” garbage. As far as Romney’s 47% comments, they were taken out of context, and if a member of the audience had asked him to clarify them by asking “well what about the people who really do need the help?” he would’ve backtracked and realized that many in that 47% really can’t work. His overall point was to say that he’s not going to waste time campaigning to groups of people who won’t vote for him anyhow. The left has done a very good job at making Romney, and most conservatives to be out for the rich, and he’s not going to change their minds, so he’s not going to try to. Obama’s idea of helping the poor is to put them all on food stamps, which isn’t really helping them at all, and Romney’s history suggests that he can create jobs.

Moving toward an issue that was big in the 2008 election, gas prices are up and so are a lot of other expenses. As it relates to fuel, why was it all George Bush’s fault back in 07-08, yet we don’t directly blame the president anymore? I find that a little suspicious. When Bush was president, all we heard was that he was a “big oil man”, and that’s why gas went so high. In the last couple of months, nationally it’s been higher than ever, but we’re not hearing about how it’s the president’s fault anymore. As it relates to other things, such as food prices going up, a large part of that is because of fuel going up. You may have heard the phrase “if you bought it, a truck brought it”, and it’s usually true. Almost all of the products we buy, even the fuel itself, is transported, which costs a lot more when fuel prices are up. There are more factors though, one in particular that we are ignoring. We now have $16 trillion in debt. When the government spends money, it has three ways of paying. The first is on our credit card to China, second to raise taxes, and third, is to print more money. For every dollar that our government prints, it lowers the value of all of the others. It’s supply and demand. Anytime that there is a shortage of anything, the value and/or price goes up, but anytime there is a surplus of a product the value and/or price goes down. So when we print a trillion dollars, it takes more of those dollars to buy a gallon of milk, or a gallon of gas.

Now, in his last campaign, Obama called Bush unpatriotic and irresponsible for the portion of debt. It’s true that Bush spent far too much money, but the media ignores the fact that Obama has spent more in 4 years than Bush did in 8! Where’s the outrage? Now to debunk this theory of the “Obama inherited a mess so that justifies it” crowd, Bush inherited a recession as well, and instead of blaming the previous administration for 4 years, he did something about it. Those evil “Bush Tax Cuts” got us out of a recession before it got too bad, and most people don’t even realize what could’ve happened because for the most part, it was prevented. I find it interesting that most people have no idea that the president has to work with congress, and the fact that they have no idea as to when Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid took over it. If you look through the history books, you’ll see that unemployment was down, and the economy was fine until about 2007, about a year and a half after the democrats took over congress, and then it felt like the bottom fell out. Hmm. Could it be that that there’s a connection between when they took over congress and the decline? Well the media says that there’s no connection so that’s what we blindly believe as well. No, George Bush wasn’t perfect, but most people would agree that his worst two years were his last two, and he didn’t have any control in those two years.

In this last section, you will see evidence to the fact that Obama is a socialist, and has had some very extreme associations, and even some appointees. Barack Obama’s biological father, as well as his mentor, Frank Marshall Davis were both communists, and during his time as a Community Organizer he came into contact with socialist groups. You may have heard of Van Jones, who was Obama’s “Green Jobs Czar”. If the media had been doing their jobs correctly, then the public would’ve known that Van Jones was an admitted communist who had very extreme connections. Glenn Beck made waves when he started telling people on his show what Van Jones was all about. You have likely heard of Bill Ayers, who is an unrepentant domestic terrorist who said he wishes that he had bombed more buildings. Obama claims that Ayers was “a guy in the neighborhood”, but there is evidence that Bill Ayers was actually the author of “Dreams of my Father”. Obviously if that is the case, then Ayers was much more than a guy in the neighborhood. He also sat on boards with Ayers, and has connections with other radical people like Luis Farrakhan, Tony Rezko, and the infamous Jeremiah Wright. You may remember that Wright was Obama’s pastor for 20 years, and baptized both of his children, yet Obama claimed that he didn’t realize how radical and racist Wright was when he was asked about Wright’s sermon that contained the words “No no no, not God ‘Bless’ America, God ‘D***’ America!” Later when Wright was asked why Obama no longer spoke with him, his answer was “Them Jews ain’t gonna let him talk to me.” These are just a few of the people that Obama has connections with, but why don’t we know more about them, and even more important and telling, is why don’t we DEMAND to know more about them? If George Bush had half of the associations that Barack Obama has, he would’ve been unelectable. Why is the standard not the same for Obama? In his first campaign, he was asked by a man that was later named “Joe the plumber” why he wants to tax his small business more, and Obama’s response was that if you build the economy from the bottom up, then everybody is doing well, and finished with the infamous phrase, “spread the wealth around”. This idea is what socialism is all about! You cannot build an economy from the ground up, because the people at the bottom will not and cannot create jobs, the people at the top do! He also made the quote recently, that if you own a business, you didn’t build that, someone else made that happen! What more evidence do we need?!? How is that not enough to prove that he is a socialist? He basically said to small business owners that they owe everything they have to the government. It wasn’t a gaffe, and he didn’t misspeak. He simply spoke from the heart, and believes that we should all depend on the government, which is practically the definition of socialism.

Anyhow, you’re going to vote for whoever you want. If you want to believe in hope and change all over again, then we’re in for 4 more years of blaming the previous administration. Mitt Romney isn’t perfect, but when you look up the facts as to who he is and what he has done for other people, he’s a good man. The amount and percentages that both he and his wife have given to charities throughout the years debunks the idea that he’s this greedy self-absorbed parasite that the media would have you to believe. He says he’s got a plan. I don’t agree with all of it, but overall, I think it could work if he gets it put into place. We’ve seen what Obama’s overall plan has been in the last 4 years, which is to tax the rich more, put more people on welfare, and to spend more money that we don’t have. We know that his policies don’t work, not just from the last 4 years, but looking at our own history, and at other systems around the world that do similar things. So our options: 4 more years of policies that don’t work, or a possibility of a balanced budget and more jobs. We’re all entitled to our own opinions, but we’re not entitled to our own facts. The media won’t present them, so I’ll do my best to do that for them.